VIEW CASE STUDY
Atelier S.
Architecture
2024
The Prague Portfolio: A Curated Selection
We do not build websites; we build digital environments for architecture, technology, and design firms to thrive. Only 1 in 10 projects meet our selection criteria for depth of impact.
How We Choose a Project
Not every challenge is a fit. We evaluate potential engagements against a lens that balances ambition with feasibility. This transparency ensures we can deliver, not just promise.
Optimization Criteria
- Does the product solve a real, measurable problem for a defined user?
- Is there technical feasibility given budget and timeline constraints?
- Can we build a unique visual language that supports the brand's authority?
Common Trade-offs
Custom Component
High control, high cost. Suits complex, brand-defining features.
Library Component
Fast, less control. Ideal for standard UI patterns within budget.
Dark Mode
Custom CMS
4K Renders
Atelier S.: Digitalizing Architectural Prestige
The Challenge
Atelier S. commanded multimillion-euro contracts, but their digital presence was cluttered. Prospects couldn't navigate their portfolio, burying the work that defined their reputation.
The Constraint
The client required a CMS that non-technical staff could update instantly during site visits, with no developer dependency.
"The new site feels like walking into their office. It carries the same weight." — Partner, Atelier S.
The Outcome
A custom-built gallery system loads 4K architectural renders without lag. We replaced generic "About" pages with a physical building timeline. Qualified leads increased by 40%.
TechFlow: SaaS Conversion Architecture
A study in removing friction from a complex product.
1
The Problem
Churn was high. Users with a powerful dashboard couldn't find value fast enough, leading to frustration and abandonment.
2
The Fix
Audited onboarding. Cut 3 redundant steps. Introduced contextual help triggered by user intent, not a static FAQ.
3
The Metric
Time-to-value reduced from 4 minutes to 45 seconds. Action clarity prioritized over feature visibility.
Visual comparison: Clutter vs. Clarity
Evidence in Detail
"This custom component handles 4K renders without preloading every image."
"We reduced the technical debt by 30% by choosing the right stack from day one."— Lead Developer, TechFlow Project
The constraint: A 3-step onboarding flow, not 6. Our trade-off: hiding advanced tools until user proficiency.
Selected Work Index
Filter by discipline to see relevant case studies.
VIEW CASE STUDY
TechFlow
SaaS
2024
VIEW CASE STUDY
Brand X
E-commerce
2023
VIEW CASE STUDY
Studio K.
Architecture
2023
VIEW CASE STUDY
FlowBase
SaaS
2023
VIEW CASE STUDY
Aura
E-commerce
2022
Questions Investors Should Ask
What is the technical debt trade-off for speed?
We document it upfront. A fast launch with hidden debt costs more than a deliberate build.
How do you handle legacy system constraints?
We design for the constraints first. The best interface is one that works with the existing backend.
Is the user research based on real tests?
We recruit local participants. A US-based test for a Czech product misses cultural context.
What happens if our team changes post-launch?
We build with your team's skill level in mind. Documentation is not an afterthought.
How is GDPR compliance addressed?
We start with privacy by design, not as a patch. EU law is a design constraint, not a feature.
What's the post-launch plan?
We establish clear handoff criteria and support windows. A project isn't "done" at launch.
Don't see your industry? We approach new challenges with our core methodology.
Start a Conversationuxpixo
Karlovo nám. 17
120 00 Praha 2, Czechia
Contact
+420 222 514 444
[email protected]
Mon-Fri: 9:00-18:00